Navigating Juvenile Justice: When a Youth Offends

At William Weinberg, we understand the complexities of the juvenile justice system and what it entails when a minor is faced with legal challenges. Juvenile justice encompasses the distinct legal protocols and courts dedicated to handling cases involving minors – typically referred to as "juveniles" – who are accused of criminal behavior.

Eligibility for Juvenile Court Assistance

Juvenile court jurisdiction varies and is not strictly defined by a fixed age. Generally, a child under seven is presumed incapable of criminal intent, while those 14 years and above may be held responsible in either juvenile or adult courts. Those between seven and fourteen need to be evaluated by prosecutors to determine if they possess the maturity to be held accountable in the juvenile justice system.

Diverse from state to state and sometimes varying from one official to another, the approach towards juvenile offenders is subject to much debate. The initial interaction with law enforcement can lead to several outcomes for the minor:

  • A warning followed by release,
  • A warning with temporary detainment until a parent or guardian arrives, or
  • Custody with a referral to the juvenile court system.
Deciding the Path: Informal vs. Formal Proceedings

Upon referral to juvenile court, an intake officer or prosecutor decides whether to:

  • Dismiss the case outright,
  • Opt for an informal resolution, or
  • File formal charges by petitioning the court.

A probation officer might make an initial recommendation, but prosecutors commonly have the final say on formal charges.

Informal Handling of Minor Offenses

Choosing to handle matters informally can lead to an appearance before a judge or probation officer, possibly coupled with counseling, restitution, community service, or probation. If there's suspicion of neglect or abuse, protective measures may be initiated for the minor's well-being.

Initiation of Formal Juvenile Court Charges

If proceedings move formally, a petition is filed and the court calendar sets the dates for the juvenile to be arraigned before a judge. Depending on the severity of the crime and the minor's background, the judge may call for a "fitness hearing" to decide if the minor should be tried as an adult or remain within juvenile jurisdiction.

Subsequent steps include plea bargaining, adjudication (trial), and post-trial disposition, where appropriate punitive or rehabilitative measures are determined. Follow-up hearings can be set to monitor the minor's progress.

Factors Influencing the Filing of Formal Charges

Several official and unofficial considerations play a part in the decision to file formal charges against a juvenile:

  • Crime severity: More severe offenses are more likely to be formally charged.
  • Minor's age: Older juveniles often face formal charges.
  • Past record: Prior interactions with the juvenile court lead to a higher likelihood of formal charges.
  • Evidence strength: Strong evidence against the minor supports formal charging.
  • Gender: Boys are statistically more likely to face formal charges than girls.
  • Social background: History of familial or educational problems may influence the decision.
  • Parental control: Less parental oversight often results in filing a petition.

Beyond the official criteria, certain subjective factors, like the minor's attitude, appearance, community support, legal representation, ethnicity, and socio-economic background can affect how cases are handled, although these should never influence the pursuit of fair justice.

At William Weinberg, we are committed to providing clear guidance and vigorous advocacy for minors navigating through the juvenile justice system. We believe in the potential for rehabilitation and the importance of a fair process for every young individual facing legal issues. For a Free Consultation, please contact us at (949) 474-8008, and let our experience be your guide and advocate.

Client Reviews
He was open, honest and compassionate (qualities you don't always find in an attorney) and his credentials proved that he is more than qualified to handle this complicated case. JoAnn H.
Not only did [my case] get resolved with great efficiency, [Mr. Weinberg and his team] were very open with me and kept the lines of communication flowing which I appreciated greatly. Ryan T.
There are many things about our conversations that told me that bill was an honest guy and knew what he was talking about. Amy C.